Where are all those 40, 50 and 60-pound fish old-timers like Frank Daignault, John Cole or Peter Matthasain spoke about with such reverence and respect? Some might argue that after the crash of striped bass stocks 25-years ago we just haven’t given the good spawning year’s fish a chance to get that big again. But I have little faith that my generation will ever see the big fish that the golden age of striped bass fishing saw. Today’s “keeper” sized fish are undoubtedly under much, much more pressure than the stocks of yesteryear were, and the number of anglers catching striped bass continues to increase exponentially. Managers did a fantastic job of imposing a moratorium and then tight size and bag restrictions allowing stripers to recover to sustainable numbers. However, today they fail to take into account the documented fact that almost all of the striped bass population gets capped off before it can reach even half of it’s natural age and size. There are just so many people out there fishing for, catching and keeping striped bass that the fish that make it past 15-years are an anomaly. But it goes even deeper than the fish falling to hooks or nets before they can become old and large.
Researchers at Stony Brook University in Long Island, NY recently conducted a study that pointed to the fact that minimum size limits drastically cut the potential for trophy fish in a population. According to Field and Stream magazine, researchers set up three tanks with small populations of Atlantic Silversides (spearing), removing the largest 90% of the population from one tank, the smallest from another, and a random selection from the 3rd. After 4 spawning generations, the average weight in the group where the largest fish were removed, was less than 1/3 of the average size in the randomly selected group. The fish in the tank where the smallest fish were removed were a whopping 6-times bigger!
What this means is that a minimum size that clearly doesn’t allow a substantial portion of the population to grow to their natural size, caps off almost all of the fish with superior genetic traits – fish that grow rapidly and spawn prolifically. In the end this can and will alter the gene pool irreparably. The extreme case would be a species that rarely grows past 28-inches. That’s a bummer!
So what’s the solution? Many folks suggest a one fish slot limit - say 24 to 28-inches. However, if managers were to impose such a thing in New York, the number of anglers and the amount of pressure on these fish is so great that it could theoretically wipe that whole year class out in short order. And these are fish that possibly haven’t even spawned once yet.
I’m not sure what the solution is, other than curbing the pressure somehow, but politically that’s entirely impossible. An increased mortality level, which translates to an increased size limit, or maybe a shorter season, I feel is the best way to go. But the ASMFC obviously felt different as it maintained the current mortality target in Amendment 6 allowing states like Massachusetts to go from one fish to two fish and the commercial quota to increase by 43%.
However, the light at the end of the tunnel is the increasing conservation or catch and release ethic that seems to be catching on quite quickly. There number of flyfishermen and light tackle enthusiasts including those who converted from catch and kill to catch and release is increasing every day. Also, conservation and environmental groups seem to be popping up all over the place and gaining more and more political clout. The push for gamefish status, while not the end-all solution is a big step in the right direction and the fact that anglers are rallying behind Stripers Forever is encouraging. But once that goal is met then there will be a fight over the recreational mortality levels, and that won’t be pretty. But, we’ll cross that bridge when we get to it.
Regardless, we seem to be headed in the right direction. Let’s continue to do so. If you are not a member of Stripers Forever or CCA yet, you’re a bum! Just kidding. If you are not a member, join now: www.stripersforever.com. www.joincca.org.
Now on to the reports:
Wind, wind and more wind this week. Add a sizable swell and it made offshore fishing more or less impossible. No one I talked to made it offshore this week. Inshore, the Southern New Jersey backwater seems to be fishing quite well at night (check out Capt. Bryan Dileo’s report.) In central New Jersey reports indicate slow fishing. Northern New Jersey and the New York Metro area continue to enjoy bluefish on the surface just about any day of the week and under any conditions. Some of the bluefish encountered under the bunker schools have been quite big, as I had some monsters take both flies and jigs on Friday. At the Breezy and the Coney Island areas there seems to be an abundance of 5-to-7-pound bluefish fining on the surface. These fish have been a blast on surface flies. They are feeding on some really small bait, which I believe are the first of the year menhaden. We’re talking less than an inch long. Still no bonito to speak of… Man I hope they show. On western Long Island, reports of big bluefish on the south shore are abundant. Same deal with the North Shore, however a good bass bight consisting of mostly schoolies is developing there as well. Out East, the south side is producing some big bass (check out Capt. Jim Hull’s report) and there has been some good action in East Hampton on the flats as well.
Some wind this weekend, but it doesn’t look so bad. So get out there and fish.