I have to admit I’m a little annoyed about something… I hate to beat yet another dead horse, but after hearing the outcome of an informal pole done at one of the local flyfishing club meetings, I think it’s worth bringing up the saltwater angling license issue yet again. “Uhhh…” I can hear the collective sigh, and the “enough already” murmur… I’ll try to be brief.
Now, I can understand the opposition to a saltwater license when it comes from the industry -- party and charter boat captains, tackle shop owners, marine manufactures etc… These guys (in my opinion incorrectly) believe that a $25 license will cause an approximate 10% drop in business – less guys buying stuff and fishing because of the financial and logistical
burden of having to purchase such a license. I think I already covered, in this venue and others, that if you’re going to dump the money that it takes to fish anywhere really, an extra $25 a year is negligible, especially compared to the benefit it will bring anglers. In states like Florida, the number of anglers actually increased exponentially once a saltwater license was establish. Anyway, I cover this in detail in a recent article. Will be glad to send it to anybody who requests it. Now, what I don’t understand is when a seemingly conservation minded club collectively rejects the notion of a saltwater fishing license. What the… who the… where the??? I don’t get it! Who are these people?
How can any conservation minded fly angler possibly be against a tool that most definitely will improve fisheries enforcement, fund a more effective and better managed Department of Environmental Conservation Marine Division and more importantly give hundreds of thousands of anglers more political clout?
Again, I’ve covered this before but I will touch on it briefly… NO! THE LICENSE MONEY WILL NOT GO INTO THE GENERAL FUND! I don’t understand why people keep saying this. It will be used for what it is intended for, just as hunting and
fishing licenses moneys have been going into the DEC conservation fund for the last 60-years. There are both federal and state legal mechanisms in place that will insure this (if you want an explanation of how, again I’d be glad to send you the full text of the above mentioned article). If license money is pilfered or used incorrectly by an agency it is in direct violation of both state and federal law and there’s hell to pay.
SO WHY???? It’s inconceivable to me that this New York flyfishing club could t
ake a position against a saltwater license. Could it be that this all boils down to the “cheapskate argument?” The “I’m too selfish and shortsighted to pay my share for more clout, better enforcement and better management of a recourse that I take advantage of” argument? How sickeningly New Yorkish… Flyfishermen spend a tremendous amount of money on gear, trips, boats, fuel etc. every year. It’s pathetic that any one of us is unwilling to put down $25 more for the future of the resource…
I challenge anyone out there to give me one good reason, other than the mentioned “cheapskate argument” to be against a saltwater license.
Maybe I take this stuff a little too personally but when you fish in an area that is infested with scumbag poachers thumbing their nose at you every day as they bail one short after another, you might see this issue in a different light. I’ve done everything I can in my power to at least get a few offercers out there enforcing the law. As a result I’ve had my boat vandalized and in all likelihood, it was probably the same poachers who sunk my SeaCraft last year. During meetings with the DEC all I got was “We can’t afford to put a marine unit out there… You’re not going to get it until we have a saltwater license.”
Meanwhile the atrocity goes on unabated while “cheapskates” complain about having to pay “another tax,” when all they’d be doing is paying a small amount to protect something that they take advantage of regularly.
In truth, I believe (and truly hope) that a New York License is coming down the line. The need for additional funding is so acute that the Marine Resource Advisory Council is currently holding focus group meetings involving stakeholders to discuss a saltwater license, as a potential way to meet budget needs. I, for one, am going to be letting decision-makers know that there is a section of the fishing population that thinks it’s a good idea and an overdo one!
Now that I’ve gotten that off my chest, let’s get on to the reports:
In Southern New Jersey, the flats-fishing was more difficult, but there was success nonetheless. In central New Jersey, reports of big bass under the bunker schools continue to filter in and while water temps warm, they’re still getting them to eat a fly during the pre-dawn and early evening hours. Surprisingly, Northern New Jersey and the New York Bight continues to get morning and afternoon busting-fish-under-birds scenarios. Jamaica Bay has begun to clear a bit, but the water is so warm, it’s mostly cocktail bluefish and the occasional schoolie bass. The fluke bight in some of the mud flats, however, has turned on and when all else fails these things can be a lot of fun. The western and central North Shore areas have been sporadically good with some days producing many schoolies and others, nothing. Not much in the way of bunker up there so not to many big fish around. The South Shore has been providing for some great sight fish opportunities and there still seems to be an abundance of bait around. East Hampton continues to offer one of the best years in recent memory for sight fishing. Montauk was very good early in the week, but slowed down towards the end (right when I got there by the way). Offshore, things are beginning to really heat up with school bluefin showing at the offshore lumps and bonito are abound as well. Things are only going to get better on this front.
Looks like more good weather this weekend… Can’t believe the luck we’re having… Go fish!