For a long, long time the “hook and bullet” crowd have been suspect of environmental groups and the politicians they support, because they were associated with the many dreaded “antis”: “anti-gun,” “anti-hunting,” “anti-fishing etc...” Some even have gone so far as to try and connect successful mainstream organizations like the Sierra Club, The Ocean Conservancy, Pew Oceans etc. to organizations like PETA (that silly group that advocates animal rights). While this may be what the conservative agenda wants you to believe, the fact of the matter is that environmental groups are not animal rights freaks and they are not out to take away your right to bear arms, hunt or to catch and eat fish. Try checking out the websites of some of these groups, and you’ll see that their boards have hunters and anglers on them.
Historically, the two greatest forces in conservation have been sportsmen and environmental groups. Hunters and anglers provided the advocacy and put up most of the money that paid for government programs rebuilding fish and wildlife populations, while the environmental groups worked on Capital Hill to provide essential federal protections for the needed habitat. But despite their obvious common interests, the two groups continue to be estranged from each other. It’s surprising to me that there are still folks out there buying into the stereotype that enviros and hunters/anglers are mutual enemies when its so obvious that they have similar goals. Unfortunately, this stereotype does still live and has become important to those politicians which oppose necessary environmental regulations and needed protection in the interest of allowing corporate special interests to do as they please. They’ve come to believe that regardless how much they turn their back on open space, clean air and clean water, they’re still going to get the sportsman’s vote.
This current administration may have pushed things so far that this sentiment is beginning to change. It has consistently rolled back environmental policies that have protected fish and wildlife habitat for a generation and sportsmen have been taking note of oil and gas wells spreading across previously protected forests and prairies, of waterfowl wetlands having had Clean Water Act protections stripped, of blue-ribbon trout streams being placed in the path of logging operations.
But there is still that contingent which clings to the anti-enviro stereotype. A number of members of and Outdoor Writers organization, which I’ve been a member of for two years, is succeeding from the organization because of a simple letter written to the National Rifle Association in defense of t
he Sierra Club. How silly… Upon exchanging emails with a well known outdoor writer about the subject he had this to say: “This is the best thing that ever happened to the group. It’s like worming a horse. We’re getting rid of the ugliest element--the “me-first,” NRA, wise-use whackos who see an “anti” behind ever coke machine and who fantasize that the environmental movement is really a plot to take their guns away. Good riddance to bad rubbish!” I have to say I agree.
Progressive members of the group, like me, realize that environmentalists have as much at stake in the battles over clean air and clean water as hunters and anglers. Hopefully, in the near future fish and wildlife issues will cease being a partisan issue. That, for sure, would be good news for hunters and anglers, environmentalists and all living things for that matter.
Now let’s get on to the reports:
Not much to report this week… In southern New Jersey, the back country has been dependable with schoolies and small bluefish. In the central section it’s been on the slow side. No reports came in from the bluewater crowd this week, but there has been talk of increased activity at the canyon. In the New York Metro area, there have been some, although very few, albie sightings. I saw a few fish east of Breezy but not near enough to get a good shot at them. I fear this may be one of those years where they just don’t show up in good numbers, but it’s still early. There have been some bluefish around, but not near the number that there should be during this time of the year. The ones that have been popping up here and there are in the 5 to 7-pound range. Jamaica Bay has been fishing terrible, unless you like 1-pound bluefish. Haven’t heard anything about Raritan Bay so I only assume it’s the same. The North Shore bonito run has been a let down so far, but there are plenty of blitzing bluefish up there and some keeper sized bass are being taken in the mix. There are also some large blues being taken in the flats. On the South Shore, again, some albie sightings but no one, as far as I know, is hooking up. Out east, things seem to be on the slower side as well. A few nice bass are being taken from the beach, but everywhere else the water is reported to be the color of chocolate milk. A lot of rain will most certainly do that. Let’s hope in cleans up by the weekend, because I’m really jonesing for some tunas. Enough already… Give us the fall! Maybe it will come this weekend.