PDA

View Full Version : Help defend your freedom to fish!


flatts1
11-03-2003, 09:32 AM
Dear Fellow Fishermen,

I am writing to inform you about a cause that is worth everyone's time. It is the Massachusetts Freedom to Fish Act (F2F). As you may or may not know, The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) and The Massachusetts Striped Bass Association (MSBA), along with a growing number of other local organizations, have been working very hard behind the scenes to make F2F into law in Massachusetts. We now need your help!

We have a tentative hearing date set at the Massachusetts State House for Thursday, November 13th and we need as many anglers as possible to fill the room - and that means you!

Why do you need to go?

There are extremist environmentalist groups seeking to close vast areas of the ocean permanently to fishing. For example, The Ocean Conservancy (TOC) is currently championing a campaign calling for a "network" of marine reserves (permanent no fishing / no take zones) in the Gulf of Maine that are at least 100 square miles. They have already succeeded in imposing such closures in California. Also, The Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) is actively calling for the creation of "fully protected ocean wildlife and habitat areas at Stellwagen Bank, where all extractive and otherwise harmful activities would be prohibited." They have their sites set on Stellwagen Bank and they promise there will be a closure there. In fact, reliable sources tell us they have the votes now on the Stellwagen Advisory Panel to do so!

These closures are arbitrary and the science cited by these organizations crumbles under minimal scrutiny. That is exactly why they are against F2F. When F2F is enacted, it will require scientific justification and tangible goals before a closure is implemented. More importantly, it will require that the closure is reevaluated over time to see if the closure's goals have been met. If not then it stays closed. If so, then F2F requires the closure will be removed. Does this sound reasonable to you? I thought so.

Folks, organizations like CLF and TOC have key people on the panels that manage your favorite fishing spot. In fact the former head of CLF, Douglas Foy, now heads the Massachusetts Department of Environment! The bottom line here is that it doesn't matter if you fish with a rod and reel or with a gill net - these groups discount us all the same. Indeed, if you take a fish home for dinner then these extremist groups consider it to be a "harmful extractive" activity. It is for reasons like this that we all need to make sure that they don't succeed in permanently taking away our access to our prime historic fishing grounds.

MSBA President, Patrick Paquette, summed it up best when he said "For years we (Recs vs. Commercials) have been arguing over the rules of the game. In this one case, what is at stake is the whole playing field."

While the Massachusetts Freedom to Fish Act will only apply to state waters (within 3 miles of the coast), do not under estimate the need for it's passage. These environmentalist groups are presently working very hard to create closures within the Commonwealth's waters and passing F2F in individual states will help pave the way for the national version of the bill that will apply to federal waters.

It is often said that most fishermen are conservation minded. I think that this is very true. All we ever ask for are reasonable regulations so that we can pursue our favorite past time while ensuring the sustainability of fish stocks. Indeed, when species are found to be in trouble, fishermen are usually the first ones to call for tighter regs. F2F is simply a legal formalization of our conservation ethic and WE NEED YOUR HELP TO SEE THAT IT BECOMES THE LAW.

Please visit the following link to learn more about The Massachusetts Freedom To Fish Act.

http://www.msba.net/f2f

Then schedule November 13th off with your employer and come to the Massachusetts State House on that day. By all means spread this message on every fishing website that you visit. Feel free to paste it whole or in part. However, keep in mind that all of the discussion in the world of this topic on internet message boards won't make nearly as much difference as actually showing up and demonstrating to our elected officials in that we will not stand by idly and let these out of touch conservation groups decide our fate. Ladies and gentlemen, fishermen of all types are the largest stakeholders in this debate. Let's show our elected officials just how large we are!

If you have any further questions or are interested in car pooling to the state house on November 13th, then please send email to f2f@basspond.com

We hope to see you there.

Sincerely,
Mike Flaherty
MSBA Political Committee Chairman

flatts1
11-03-2003, 05:06 PM
RFA Press Release Page 1/2

flatts1
11-03-2003, 05:07 PM
RFA Press Release Page 2/2

G-Man
11-04-2003, 01:34 AM
You guys may flame my ass, but I really would not mind if they closed "vast areas of the ocean" to fishing. I would not even mind if they made the whole fricken east coast catch and release, until fish populations returned. It will never happen tho. Our fish stocks are so depleted in just 2 generations...it's sad.

Talk to someone in their 80's about what fishing the ocean was like back then. It was amazing.

I love to fish, but if there was a way to bring back the flounder, manhaden, cod, and tuna well....that would be a dream eh? We still have Russian ships dredging our shores of bait fish. It's crazy.

Anyway, what's the big deal...is there any fish left out on George's bank and Stellwagen anyway? What's a better solution than closing fishing out there?
-G

ps
Mike...sorry for venting on your thread here buddy. I'm sure you have the fisherman's best interest in mind. I hope something sensible comes out of the meeting. Sorry...I can't make it.

talbot3
11-04-2003, 08:15 AM
I don't rest real easy seeing someone from Gloucester is cosponsoring the bill.

What is the impact of f2f on netting and dragging inside 3 miles?

Duncan Talbot

G-Man
11-04-2003, 10:47 AM
Good point there Talbot.

You can tell from our fishing reports...it's not the reel time guys draining the ocean of fish now is it? :D

flatts1
11-17-2003, 12:37 PM
The following is an excerpt of a letter by MSBA President, Patrick Paquette, to the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Natural Resources and Agriculture. It was submitted by Mr. Paquette after his testimony at the Massachusetts State House on November 13, 2003

The full text may be found at

http://www.msba.net/f2f/msba_statehouse_letter.htm

Best,
Mike Flaherty
Proud Member of MSBA

...

Way back in February I learned of a few “Environmental” organizations that were able to get prime-fishing waters in the state of California permanently closed to all fishing. This closure was accomplished by using an extreme definition of the management tool known as a “Marine Protected Area”. More commonly known as “MPAs”, Marine Protected Areas have been used for years and in some cases have been supported by recreational and even commercial communities. A closer look at the California situation revealed a national strategy by some fringe or extreme environmental groups to do the same in the waters of each and every coastal state, including Massachusetts. Just in case you are not aware, the area in California that was closed is called the Channel Islands. The only fair comparison in Massachusetts would be the Elizabeth Islands. What would happen if the Elizabeth Islands were closed to all fishing? Representative Turkington could answer that question better than any of us standing in the audience today. After learning about this situation, MSBA in conjunction with our national affiliate, the Recreational Fishing Alliance, formed the Massachusetts Freedom to Fish Coalition. Our vision was to put together a group of both recreational and commercial organizations and bring forth a Bill in the MA Legislature that would both allow for the traditional use of a Marine Protected Area, and protect the rights of both recreational & commercial fishermen to do what we do, to fish. Standing here we have accomplished that goal. Our coalition is made up of Recreational Fishing Organizations including the Plum Island Surfcasters, The Marblehead Surfcasters, the Cape Cod Salties, the Green Harbor Tuna Club and the Massachusetts Striped Bass Assn. We also have groups with commercial interests as well, groups including the Cape Cod Charter Boat Assn, The Stellwagon Bank Charter Captains Assn, and The North East Charter Boat Assn. In addition, we have also been working with the Cape Cod Commercial Hook Fisherman’s Assn, the Massachusetts Fisherman’s Partnership and the Massachusetts Seafood Coalition in order to bring forth a slightly amended version of the bill at hand. The fact that the recreational and commercial communities are working together should in and of itself prove that the need for this bill to go before the State Legislature is valid.

flatts1
11-17-2003, 01:27 PM
It should be noted that the Massachusetts Beach Buggy Association (MBBA) is also a key member of the MA F2F coalition. I know that Patrick did mention MBBA in his verbal testimony but somehow it was missed in the letter to the committee. This letter was sent to me for printing at 2:36am the morning of the hearing and I apologize for not catching it then.

Indeed, MBBA has been very helpful since the beginning with MA F2F. Several MBBA members did attend the hearing on Nov 13 and MBBA President, Peter Murray, spoke passionately to the committee in support of bill S2043, the Freedom To Fish Act.

We are very grateful for MBBA's support and I apologize for not noticing that they were not included on the letter in the list of groups supporting MA F2F.

Best,
Mike Flaherty
MSBA Political Committee Chairman

P.S.
MBBA is also (and has always been) listed on the MA F2F website as an organization supporting MA F2F.

flatts1
11-25-2003, 04:20 PM
MSBA Letter to OMTF Requesting Clarification of its Purpose:


An excerpt follows and the full text may be found at...

http://www.msba.net/f2f/msba_omt_2.htm

I think this letter helps to illustrate just how entrenched environmentalist
groups are in the processes that may decide the fate of your favorite
fishing holes.

Best,
Mike Flaherty
MSBA Political Committee Chairman

=====
On November 13, 2003 MSBA and a number of other Massachusetts organizations
attended a hearing before the Joint Committee on Natural Resources and
Agriculture at the Massachusetts State House in order to testify in favor of
bill S2043. This bill is also known as the Freedom to Fish Act. This bill
calls for scientific justification before a fishing closure can be put in
place. It also calls for evaluation criteria to be met in order to see if
the goal of a closure is being met. If the goal is being met then the
closure would stay in place, if not then the closure would be removed. It
is a very straightforward and reasonable bill. However, it is being
strongly opposed by The Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) and The
Massachusetts Audubon Society. Both of these organizations have members on
the OMTF and these individuals were also in attendance at the state house
that day to testify against this bill.

MSBA does not question the right of these environmentalist groups to oppose
the Freedom to Fish Act. However it is now very clear to us that these
environmentalist groups are using the OMTF work in order to help persuade
legislators to vote against the bill.

This concerns our organization greatly. It seems clear that these groups
are in the OMTF pushing their own agenda and not working in an open-minded
voyage of discovery with regard to addressing the issues that may or may not
be needed in the OMTF Framework.

...

MSBA believes that the efforts by OMTF members Priscilla Brooks and Jack
Clark are clearly not in the best interest of the OMTF. In fact these
members could actually undermine the legitimacy of the hard work put forth
by the other members on the OMTF who are sincerely working hard to develop a
fair and balanced framework that would benefit the citizens of the
Commonwealth. As we have written before, the fact that Ms. Brooks' former
superior at CLF, Douglas Foy, is now the head of the Commonwealth's offices
of Environment and Energy should raise serious concerns about what CLF hopes
to gain by being a part of the OMTF.