Vic T
04-15-2004, 09:00 AM
Hi Dick,
In your book you mention "liveliness" in fly action being a desirable quality; my own limited bonefishing experience has confirmed that materials with natural movement out-perform static materials. I have had such excellent luck with Henry Cowen's Bonefish Scampi (rabbit fur wing & polar fiber veil over a Gotcha body), that it is now my go-to fly. Are we evolving into using these breathable, lifelike materials patterns instead older, more static patterns? Flies by Tim Borski, Jeffrey Cardenas and others use more active materials and seem to be quite successful. The Gotcha with sili-legs outperforms traditional Gotchas according to some Bahamian guides. I does seem that bf are more easily fooled by "pulsating materials, the interplay of light, pattern, and moving parts" as you say in your book.
As I look through the numerous flies I have tied for the Bahamas, they are almost all tied with breathable, lively materials. I am tying Clousers with arctic fox wings and sili-legs for more action, and using arctic fox or polar fiber wings when I tie Squimp patterns. There are few Crazy Charlies in my fly boxes because they seem to lifeless to me (though they have obviously caught thousands of bonefish). My boxes are loaded with flies with sili-legs, rabbit fur, fox fur, polar fiber, etc. The Bahamas and Florida are my only destinations for bonefish. Can you tell me more about this subject and is bonefishing moving away from the older more static patterns? Thank you.
In your book you mention "liveliness" in fly action being a desirable quality; my own limited bonefishing experience has confirmed that materials with natural movement out-perform static materials. I have had such excellent luck with Henry Cowen's Bonefish Scampi (rabbit fur wing & polar fiber veil over a Gotcha body), that it is now my go-to fly. Are we evolving into using these breathable, lifelike materials patterns instead older, more static patterns? Flies by Tim Borski, Jeffrey Cardenas and others use more active materials and seem to be quite successful. The Gotcha with sili-legs outperforms traditional Gotchas according to some Bahamian guides. I does seem that bf are more easily fooled by "pulsating materials, the interplay of light, pattern, and moving parts" as you say in your book.
As I look through the numerous flies I have tied for the Bahamas, they are almost all tied with breathable, lively materials. I am tying Clousers with arctic fox wings and sili-legs for more action, and using arctic fox or polar fiber wings when I tie Squimp patterns. There are few Crazy Charlies in my fly boxes because they seem to lifeless to me (though they have obviously caught thousands of bonefish). My boxes are loaded with flies with sili-legs, rabbit fur, fox fur, polar fiber, etc. The Bahamas and Florida are my only destinations for bonefish. Can you tell me more about this subject and is bonefishing moving away from the older more static patterns? Thank you.